đźšš Free Worldwide Shipping on All Orders!Shop Now
Douglas Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc.: Defendants' Materials, Third Edition
In Doug Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc., the plaintiff, a Chinese-American, claims he had a significant business relationship with Michelle Greenwood and that the defendant, his brother-in-law, improperly interfered with that relationship by making a series of improper and false statements about the quality of his work. As a result of these statements, the plaintiff claims that Greenwood broke off her relationship with him and instead gave the contract to the defendant's company, Ross Construction Company. The plaintiff also believes that the defendant not only bears a personal grudge, but an ethnic bias as well.
Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Douglas Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc.: Defendants' Materials, Third Edition
Douglas Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc.: Defendants' Materials, Third Edition
In Doug Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc., the plaintiff, a Chinese-American, claims he had a significant business relationship with Michelle Greenwood and that the defendant, his brother-in-law, improperly interfered with that relationship by making a series of improper and false statements about the quality of his work. As a result of these statements, the plaintiff claims that Greenwood broke off her relationship with him and instead gave the contract to the defendant's company, Ross Construction Company. The plaintiff also believes that the defendant not only bears a personal grudge, but an ethnic bias as well.
$25.90
Original: $74.00
-65%Douglas Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc.: Defendants' Materials, Third Edition—
$74.00
$25.90Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Description
In Doug Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc., the plaintiff, a Chinese-American, claims he had a significant business relationship with Michelle Greenwood and that the defendant, his brother-in-law, improperly interfered with that relationship by making a series of improper and false statements about the quality of his work. As a result of these statements, the plaintiff claims that Greenwood broke off her relationship with him and instead gave the contract to the defendant's company, Ross Construction Company. The plaintiff also believes that the defendant not only bears a personal grudge, but an ethnic bias as well.
