đźšš Free Worldwide Shipping on All Orders!Shop Now
HomeStore

Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law, Forty-second Edition

Product image 1

Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law, Forty-second Edition

Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law, Forty-second Edition

ABOUT THE BOOK—TOOLS TO SUCCEED 
  • The Capsule Summary provides a quick reference summary of the key concepts covered in the full Outline.
  • The detailed course Outline with black letter principles supplements your casebook reading throughout the semester and gives structure to your own outline.
  • The Quiz Yourselffeature includes a series of short-answer questions and sample answers to help you test your knowledge of the chapter’s content. 
  • Exam Tips alert you to issues and commonly used fact patterns found on exams.
  • The Casebook Correlation Chart correlates each section in the Outline with the pages covering that topic in the major casebooks.
INCLUDED IN THIS NEW EDITION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EMANUEL® LAW OUTLINE
Coverage of key 2023–2024 Supreme Court developments, including:
  • Trump v. U.S., holding that Presidents are entitled to at least a presumption of immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts. In some contexts, the immunity is absolute, and in others, the President benefits from a strong “presumption of immunity” that will be difficult for the prosecution to rebut.
  • U.S. v. Rahimi, a Second Amendment case, holding that government may restrict certain persons from owning guns. However, the restriction must be “relevantly similar” to restrictions that existed in 1791.
  • Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, indicating that government likely violates the free-expression rights of a social media platform if government enacts an “anti-censorship” rule that requires the platform to include third-party posts that the platform wants to keep off the site.
  • Murthy v. Missouri, a case about standing, holding that a plaintiff does not have standing unless she can show that a favorable outcome in the suit would “redress” the harm from whatever action (usually a government action) the plaintiff is challenging.
Select Only eStore Format
From $11.90

Original: $33.99

-65%
Emanuel Law Outlines for Constitutional Law, Forty-second Edition—

$33.99

$11.90

Product Information

Shipping & Returns

Description

ABOUT THE BOOK—TOOLS TO SUCCEED 
  • The Capsule Summary provides a quick reference summary of the key concepts covered in the full Outline.
  • The detailed course Outline with black letter principles supplements your casebook reading throughout the semester and gives structure to your own outline.
  • The Quiz Yourselffeature includes a series of short-answer questions and sample answers to help you test your knowledge of the chapter’s content. 
  • Exam Tips alert you to issues and commonly used fact patterns found on exams.
  • The Casebook Correlation Chart correlates each section in the Outline with the pages covering that topic in the major casebooks.
INCLUDED IN THIS NEW EDITION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EMANUEL® LAW OUTLINE
Coverage of key 2023–2024 Supreme Court developments, including:
  • Trump v. U.S., holding that Presidents are entitled to at least a presumption of immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts. In some contexts, the immunity is absolute, and in others, the President benefits from a strong “presumption of immunity” that will be difficult for the prosecution to rebut.
  • U.S. v. Rahimi, a Second Amendment case, holding that government may restrict certain persons from owning guns. However, the restriction must be “relevantly similar” to restrictions that existed in 1791.
  • Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, indicating that government likely violates the free-expression rights of a social media platform if government enacts an “anti-censorship” rule that requires the platform to include third-party posts that the platform wants to keep off the site.
  • Murthy v. Missouri, a case about standing, holding that a plaintiff does not have standing unless she can show that a favorable outcome in the suit would “redress” the harm from whatever action (usually a government action) the plaintiff is challenging.